Stubblefield v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was within the trial court’s discretion whether to appoint and who to appoint as an interpreter for the complaining witness
• An interpreter’s translation of a •witness’ testimony need not be literal, so long as the translation is equivalent to the answers of the witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).