Stuart Yacht Club & Marina v. STATE, DNR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agency concluded that proposed regulation would have no impact on small businesses because it assumed that all businesses that'fell below relevant regulatory threshold would be “small businesses”
• attorney’s fees denied under § 120.57(l)(b)10, Fla.Stat. (1993), where some agency action was incorrect, but not flagrant or inexcusable
• “The agency’s interpretation need not be the only one or the most desirable; it is enough if that interpretation is permissible under the language of the statute.”
• failure of agency to give requisite statutory notice of a proposed rule to a party was harmless when the party had indirectly received actual notice of the intended action
• absence of required notice immaterial when a party acquires knowledge otherwise
• absence of required notice immaterial when a party acquires knowledge otherwise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).