Stuart v. Stuart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proceeds from a class-action medical-malpractice suit, when received, would constitute income for child-support purposes
• holding that proceeds from a class-action medical-malpractice suit, when received, would constitute income for child-support purposes
• holding that class-action settlement fell within the definition of “income” for child support purposes
• explaining that a definition of “income” that includes in part “worker’s compensation [and] disability” was “no longer tied to the federal tax code” because it was intentionally broadened

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2017-03-08· cited 8×
• Dupigny v. Tyson
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2017-02-24· cited 6×
• Troutman v. Troutman
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-02-03· cited 3×
• Boyd v. Crocker
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2017-02-22· cited 3×
• Fusher v. Fusher
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2008-09-17· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kelly v. Kelly
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-06-08· cited 37×
• Evans v. Tillery
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-03-03· cited 33×
• Cole v. Cole
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-01-05· cited 32×
• Brown v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2002-02-27· cited 27×
• In Re Guidelines for Child Support Enf.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-02-05· cited 25×
• Delacey v. Delacey
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-03-24· cited 25×
• Montgomery v. Bolton
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-27· cited 17×
• Huey v. Huey
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-02-23· cited 7×