Skip to main content
· 3/13/1916

Stuart v. Rosengarten

Citations

  • 252 Pa. 609
  • 97 A. 851
  • 1916 Pa. LEXIS 669

Syllabus

<p>Equity — Easements—Interference — Insufficient evidence — Bill for injunction — Dismissal.</p> <p>Where in a suit in equity to restrain defendants from interfering with plaintiff’s use of a road extending from her property over defendants’ property to a public road, it appeared that the easement was by express grant and not a way by necessity, -and was described as a road or cartway of ten feet wide and there was ample evidence to support the finding of the lower court that the obstruction complained of by plaintiff did not encroach upon her easement but always left a space ten feet in the clear for plaintiff’s use, the bill was properly dismissed.</p>

Judges: Frazer, Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart, Walling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.