Skip to main content
· 1/17/2014

Stuart v. Loomis

Citations

  • 992 F. Supp. 2d 585
  • 2014 WL 186310
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s notes that “simply recorded his observations” constituted fact work product and compelling disclosure
  • finding substantial need for a witness statement taken at the scene of the accident because the statement captured the witness’s immediate perception of said accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.