· 1/17/2014
Stuart v. Loomis
Citations
- 992 F. Supp. 2d 585
- 2014 WL 186310
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6194
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant’s notes that “simply recorded his observations” constituted fact work product and compelling disclosure
- finding substantial need for a witness statement taken at the scene of the accident because the statement captured the witness’s immediate perception of said accident
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eagles
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.