Stuart v. Harkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiffs physician not liable for \any act or omission\ by specialist whom physician brought in to consult and assist in connection with plaintiff s treatment
• objection to admission of de bene evidence properly overruled where no motion to strike made subsequently
• temporary treatment given by consulting physician for a specific purpose gave rise to no duty to provide treatment or advice to patient beyond the specific scope of his consultation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).