Stuart v. Danka Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff was “industrious” and “able to assume positions of significant responsibility”
• plaintiff failed to present any evidence that he could not work generally or his employment was limited in any way as a result of alcoholism and therefore failed to establish prima facie case under ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).