Stuart v. Clements

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying summary judgment on emotional damages where consumer testified that he suffered from “inability to sleep” and “anxiety,” “for something more than a ‘brief’ period, as a result of [the furnisher’s] conduct,” which his daughter corroborated through a declaration
• “In the absence of [actual] damages, . . . an FCRA negligence claim fails.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).