· 6/10/1907

Stuart v. Ansley

Citations

119 La. 549
44 So. 294
1907 La. LEXIS 522

Syllabus

1. Appeal — Bond—Sufficiency. The court of the first instance after an appeal has been taken still has jurisdiction to pass upon the question of the insolvency or illegality of the bond. '[Ed. Note. — Eor cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 2, Appeal and Error, §§ 2205-2207.] 2. Same. The district court in accordance with this view, after some delay, owing to oversight, decided that the bond was sufficient and' legal. 3. Same — Conclusiveness op Decision. The decision put an end to further issues upon the subject in the district court. (Syllabus by the Court.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

alleged confiscation of prisoner’s legal papers during transfer between 24 facilities did not warrant tolling where nothing suggested any confiscation “was intentionally obstructive or wrongful”
in ruling on objections, holding that, because “new claims may not be raised properly at this late juncture,” such claims “presented in the form of, or along with, ‘objections,’ should be dismissed”
“new claims may not be raised properly at this late juncture”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.