Skip to main content
· 3/18/1994

Stuart Park Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Ameritech Pension Trust

Citations

  • 846 F. Supp. 701
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3270
  • 1994 WL 92227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Ameritech defendants cannot present evidence that the parties intended actual delivery, because such an argument conflicts with an express provision of the signed document.”
  • “Ordinarily, a contract whose performance would violate federal law is unenforceable and, therefore, neither party can recover on it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alesia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.