· 3/18/1994
Stuart Park Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Ameritech Pension Trust
Citations
- 846 F. Supp. 701
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3270
- 1994 WL 92227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Ameritech defendants cannot present evidence that the parties intended actual delivery, because such an argument conflicts with an express provision of the signed document.”
- “Ordinarily, a contract whose performance would violate federal law is unenforceable and, therefore, neither party can recover on it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alesia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.