· 1/25/1980
Stuart M. Kaplan, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Palmer Data Corporation D/B/A Computerminal v. Burroughs Corporation
Citations
- 611 F.2d 286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure to produce substantive evidence proving relevant market entitles defendant, in rule of reason ease, to judgment n.o.v.
- “It is the impact upon competitive conditions in a definable product market which distinguishes the antitrust violation from the ordinary business tort”
- “In defining the relevant market, the court must look beyond the particular commodity produced by an alleged monopolist because the relevant product market for determining monopoly power, or the threat of monopoly control, depends upon the availability of alternative commodities for buyers.”
- affirming judgment non obstante veredicto
- affirming judgment non obstante veredicto
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hufstedler, Anderson, Wyatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.