STUART L. STEIN, PA v. Miller Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \increasing the burden of proof to a `clear and convincing' standard did not amount to a substantive change in the statutory scheme\ and therefore, may be applied retroactively
• holding that “increasing the burden of proof to a ‘clear and convincing’ standard did not amount to a substantive change in the statutory scheme” and therefore, may be applied retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).