Stuart James Mohr v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the privilege is “designed to prevent interference with the administration of justice, and, particularly, to encourage those who are not bound to attend to do so voluntarily and thus assist the courts in their work”
• denying immunity, in part, because the party was not voluntarily in the forum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).