Skip to main content
· 10/21/2013

Strzelczyk v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 476
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 322
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3234
  • 571 U.S. 976
  • 2013 WL 4402511
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating sentence because court applied both (b)(5) and (b)(6)(B) for same conduct
  • in sentencing defen‐ dant for being a felon in possession, district court erred in applying trafficking enhancement, see § 2K2.1(b)(5
  • quot- ing Swanson v. United States, 692 F.3d 708, 715 (7th Cir. 2012)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.