Stryker v. Goodnow's Administrator
Citations
- 123 U.S. 527
- 8 S. Ct. 203
- 31 L. Ed. 194
- 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2192
Syllabus
<p>ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA.</p> <p>Upon the record in this case, the question whether the lands of the plaintiffs in error were taxable is not a Federal (Question, but is one on which the decision of the highest court of the State of Iowa is conclusive; and it is not reviewable here.</p> <p>Homestead Company v. Valley Railroad, 17 Wall. 153, is a judicial precedent, which might have been referred to as a reason for holding that taxes paid, under the circumstances in which the payments of taxes in contention in these suits wore made, cannot be recovered by the party paying them from the true owners of the land; but it is no bar, as an estoppel, to the recovery in these cases.</p> <p>The judgment of this court in Wolcott v. Des Moines Company, 5 Wall. 681, while il may be referred to by the parties in this suit as a judicial precedent, does not operate as an estoppel against the defendant in error.</p> <p>The filing of a brief in a suit by a person interested in the question to be decided, but not a party to the suit, does not estop him in a suit of his own from presenting the same question.</p>
Judges: Waite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-09-14· cited 235×
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-05-04· cited 100×
- Guillermo Gallego Munoz v. County of ImperialNinth Circuit· 1982-02-08· cited 70×
- Brown v. WrightFourth Circuit· 1943-08-11· cited 39×
- Hickman v. Southwest Dairy Suppliers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1975-05-29· cited 33×
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. Winget Kickernick Co.Eighth Circuit· 1938-05-16· cited 29×
- Hy-Lo Unit & Metal Products Co. v. Remote Control Mfg. Co.Ninth Circuit· 1936-04-13· cited 14×
- Coleman v. BosworthSupreme Court of Iowa· 1917-09-22· cited 11×
- Garland Co. v. FilmerN.D. California· 1932-07-16· cited 8×
- Alabama ex rel. Siegelman v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyEleventh Circuit· 1990-08-23· cited 8×
- Beres v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-04-12· cited 6×
- Kunkel v. Eastern Iowa Light & Power CooperativeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1942-10-27· cited 6×
- M. B. Fahey Tobacco Co. v. SeniorE.D. Pennsylvania· 1917-12-22· cited 6×
- Rochester Co-operative Milk Producers Bargaining Agency, Inc. v. Du MondNew York Supreme Court· 1945-07-31· cited 5×
- Bryant v. Nelson-Frey Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1905-03-03· cited 4×
- Fellman v. Royal Ins.Fifth Circuit· 1911-02-21· cited 4×
- State of Alabama v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyEleventh Circuit· 1990-08-23· cited 3×
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Cascade Kelly Holdings LLCD. Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 3×
- In the Matter of the Application of the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia to Unseal Certain RecordsDistrict of Columbia· 2022-06-13
- Williams v. Lumbermen's InsurancePhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1937-01-22
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wolsey v. ChapmanSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 98×
- Dubuque & Pacific Railroad v. LitchfieldSupreme Court· 1860-04-18· cited 66×
- Wolcott v. Des Moines Co.Supreme Court· 1867-05-13· cited 59×
- Williams v. BakerSupreme Court· 1873-02-10· cited 17×
- Litchfield v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.