Stryker Corporation and Osteonics Corporation v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc., and Marli Medical Supplies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding willfulness where no notice was received from the patent holder, but infringer’s patent attorney saw reference to a patent in the Official Gazette
• “The court’s finding of willful infringement is one of fact, subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.”
• “The court’s finding of willful infringement is one of fact, subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.”
• “We have found no authority in our precedent for the 2 The court has not considered the factors from Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc., 970 F.2d 816 (Fed. Cir. 1992), abrogated in part on other grounds by Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 (1996

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).