Skip to main content
· 8/27/1990

Strutz v. McNagny

Citations

  • 558 N.E.2d 1103
  • 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 1111
  • 1990 WL 125602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissal without prejudice to allow for claims to be filed in another pending proceeding did not constitute favorable termination
  • “If Strutz somehow imagines that the existence of this remedy [under T.R. 53.1] is a basis for appeal to this court, he is sorely in error. The purpose of the lazy judge provision is to expedite litigation, hence the availability of the writ of mandate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Chezem

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.