District of Columbia· 3/10/2011
Strunk v. United States Department
Citations
- 770 F. Supp. 2d 10
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24978
- 2011 WL 855802
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[0]pinion and speculation as to the existence or wrongful destruction of responsive records are not relevant considerations in this FOIA action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard J. Leon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hedrick v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2016-10-24· cited 43×
- Hooker v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-21· cited 18×
- Strunk v. United States Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2012-02-22· cited 12×
- Strunk v. United States Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2012-11-21· cited 10×
- Parker v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-23· cited 5×
- Passmore v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-28· cited 5×
- Callaway v. United States Department of TreasuryDistrict of Columbia· 2012-09-30· cited 3×
- Beltranena v. ClintonDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-17
- Elgabrowny v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2019-03-31
- American Immigration Council v. U.S. Immigration and Custom EnforcementDistrict of Columbia· 2020-05-27
Other cases named Strunk v. United States Department
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.