Struck v. Kohler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court was “not convinced that Congress 3 In their opening brief, the State Defendants argue that “the Nation asserts broadly that the State Defendants violated ‘the IGRA,’ without reference to any specific subdivisions,” (Dkt. No. 37-1, at 18
• “IGRA provides no comparable remedy [to the remedy in Armstrong] for allegedly preempted state efforts to regulate Indian gaming.”
• “Were the 4 law otherwise, the exception would always apply. Governors who influence state 5 executive branch policies (which virtually all governors do) would always be subject 6 to suit under Ex parte Young. The exception would become the rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).