Strozier v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming without deciding that a lesser included offense can constitute a \sole defense\ under Tarvestad
• jury may infer “that persons of sound mind and discretion intend the natural and probable consequences of their acts”
• “a presumption exists that persons of sound 5 mind and discretion intend the natural and probable consequences of their acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Collins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-01-05· cited 15×
• Grant v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-10-01· cited 10×
• Mobley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-05-18· cited 9×
• Murray v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-09-11· cited 9×
• CLARK v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-10-26· cited 4×
• Smiley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-03-13· cited 3×
• Shalynda Perry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2023-01-05

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Tarvestad v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-10-18· cited 103×
• Noggle v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-10-08· cited 65×
• Mallory v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-06-01· cited 48×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-11-28· cited 46×
• McKibbons v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-05-14· cited 20×
• Kennedy v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-10-22· cited 19×
• Altman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-12-08· cited 18×
• Anderson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-04-17· cited 12×
• Dunn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-22· cited 6×