Stroud v. McIntosh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction could convey prevailing party status
• noting that being the prevailing party is not dependent upon a judgment on the merits of a claim
• upholding attorneys’ fees award based solely on finding that the relator’s claim was clearly frivolous and declining to address the other two elements because they were “not necessary to our disposition”
• dismissal for failure to meet the False Claims Act’s subject-matter-jurisdictional requirement that a plaintiff relying on certain public information be the original source of the information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).