Skip to main content

Stroud v. Lints

Citations

  • 760 N.E.2d 1176
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 27
  • 2002 WL 57296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the state’s interest in keeping its highways safe from intoxicated drivers
  • upholding punitive damage award to injured passenger of drunk driver who drank excessively, drove ninety-four miles an hour past a stopped line of traffic, through a stop sign, and into another vehicle
  • upholding punitive damage award to injured passenger of drunk driver who drank excessively, drove ninety-four miles an hour past a stopped line of traffic, through a stop sign, and into another vehicle
  • following the U. S. Supreme Court’s remand for reconsideration in light of Leatherman, the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded that since no federal constitutional claim was raised, it could review the common law excessiveness claim under an abuse of discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Mattingly-May, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.