Stroud ex rel. Schuette v. Strawn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence was sufficient where there was testimony that appellant was seen threatening the victim and that other people were afraid
• holding that the state may establish a victim's \well-founded fear of imminent bodily injury\ through circumstantial evidence, without the victim's testimony, and thereby upholding an aggravated assault conviction
• noting that the victim did not testify but holding that the trial court could conclude that the appellant's actions would put a reasonable person in fear
• examining whether there was evidence of a well-founded fear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).