Strother v. Harte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding on a motion to dismiss that RFPA claim was time-barred where affidavit submitted in the course of the state court litigation indicated that plaintiffs financial information was disclosed
• “For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”
• “For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”’
• “For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”
• “For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”
• “For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).