Strother v. Columbus

Citations

• 200 N.E.3d 1265
• 2022 Ohio 4097

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in granting one defendant's Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion because the statute-of-limitations defense was apparent from the face of the complaint and the complaint contained no allegations establishing an exception to the defense. The trial court erred in granting the other defendant's motion for summary judgment on the basis the action was time barred because a question of fact existed as to the date plaintiff filed his complaint.