· 5/13/2005
Strong v. Unumprovident Corp.
Citations
- 393 F. Supp. 2d 1012
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35384
- 2005 WL 1140650
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evaluating whether Unum and UnumProvident are joint ventures of Provident at the summary judgment stage
- Plaintiff did not established reasonable likelihood of proving “the requisite ‘extremely harmful state of mind’ and ‘extreme deviation from reasonable standards’” because of conflicting evidence
- Plaintiff did not established reasonable likelihood of proving “the requisite ‘extremely harmful state of mind’ and ‘extreme deviation from reasonable standards’” because of conflicting evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lodge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.