Skip to main content
· 5/13/2005

Strong v. Unumprovident Corp.

Citations

  • 393 F. Supp. 2d 1012
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35384
  • 2005 WL 1140650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evaluating whether Unum and UnumProvident are joint ventures of Provident at the summary judgment stage
  • Plaintiff did not established reasonable likelihood of proving “the requisite ‘extremely harmful state of mind’ and ‘extreme deviation from reasonable standards’” because of conflicting evidence
  • Plaintiff did not established reasonable likelihood of proving “the requisite ‘extremely harmful state of mind’ and ‘extreme deviation from reasonable standards’” because of conflicting evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lodge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.