Michigan Supreme Court· 2/27/1891
Strong v. Smith
Citations
- 84 Mich. 567
- 48 N.W. 183
- 1891 Mich. LEXIS 848
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining purpose of the former antilapse statute
- explaining purpose of the former antilapse statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGrath, Other
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court· 1914-10-03· cited 29×
- Downing v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1902-01-31· cited 24×
- Steidl v. FreygangCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-12-31· cited 19×
- Hoverstad v. First National Bank and Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1955-12-19· cited 9×
- Hadley v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court· 1921-06-06· cited 7×
- Trenton Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. SibbitsNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1901-06-03· cited 6×
- In Re Fitzpatrick EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-04-07· cited 4×
- Fitzpatrick v. WolfeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-04-07· cited 1×
- Rea v. GriffinMadison County Court of Common Pleas· 1916-08-14
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- StockbridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1888-01-06· cited 17×
- Nutter v. VickerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1874-07-01· cited 15×
- Eberts v. EbertsMichigan Supreme Court· 1880-01-13· cited 15×
- Dixon v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court· 1889-10-26· cited 14×
- Moses v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1889-01-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.