Skip to main content
· 10/15/1884

Strong v. Harrison

Citations

  • 62 Miss. 61

Syllabus

<p>1. Chancery Practice. Dissolution of injunction. Dismissal of bill.</p> <p>It is error for a chancery court to dismiss a bill upon a motion to dissolve the injunction in the case, whether the injunction be wholly or partially dissolved. Code 1880, $ 1917; Maury v. Smith, 46 Miss. 81.</p> <p>2. Same. Motion to dissolve injunction. Notice, when not required.</p> <p>. Where, upon an appeal from a decree on a motion to dissolve an Bijunction, the motion does not appear in the record, nor any notice thereof to the complainant, but it does appear that the defendants’ answer was filed inore than five days before the hearing on the motion, this court, being unable to say that the motion was not on the docket for five days before the hearing, cannot hold that the complainant was entitled to notice of the motion. Code 1880, l 1914.</p> <p>8. Same. Dissolution of injunction. Attorney’s fees. Evidence.</p> <p>Upon an appeal from a decree dissolving an injunction and allowing the defendant an attorney’s fee, this court will presume, if there be no evidence in the record as to such fee, that it was based upon oral testimony.</p>

Judges: Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.