Strong v. Courcelle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment, finding “there is no evidence of a single instance in which a Defendant was punished for deviating from the conspiracy”
• “[T]he fact that Defendants listened to their competitors’ communications cannot raise an inference of illicit collusion.”
• “It should not be a mark of conspiracy to say what is true, already known by the audience, and articulated by countless third-party analysts, academicians, and jurists alike.”
• disregarding industry-wide data for that reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).