Skip to main content
· 9/28/2005

Strome and Strome

Citations

  • 120 P.3d 499
  • 201 Or. App. 625
  • 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence that the grandmother was primary caretaker for four years was “offset by evidence that [the] father was the primary caretaker in the 10 months prior to the hearing”
  • “In the absence of evidence that father’s drug use has continued into the present * * * we cannot conclude that father’s past substance abuse poses a serious present risk of psychological, emotional, or physical harm.”
  • “In the absence of evidence that father’s drug use has continued into the present, * * * we cannot conclude that father’s past substance abuse poses a serious present risk of psychological, emotional, or physical harm.”
  • focusing on the parent’s recent adequacy when discussing factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.