· 1/12/1996
Stroik v. State
Citations
- 671 A.2d 1335
- 1996 Del. LEXIS 21
- 1996 WL 19288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[v]iolation of 11 Del. C. § 1503(a) does not require an agreement and can be achieved through the acts of one person,” and that “[i]t is clear that 11 Del. C. § 1503(d
- stating that, “[s]ince the Delaware RICO statute is essentially an adaptation of its federal counterpart, reliance on federal precedent in this limited factual setting is warranted.”
- “Since the Delaware RICO statute is essentially an adaptation of its federal counterpart, reliance on federal precedent in this limited factual setting is warranted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.