Skip to main content
· 1/12/1996

Stroik v. State

Citations

  • 671 A.2d 1335
  • 1996 Del. LEXIS 21
  • 1996 WL 19288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[v]iolation of 11 Del. C. § 1503(a) does not require an agreement and can be achieved through the acts of one person,” and that “[i]t is clear that 11 Del. C. § 1503(d
  • stating that, “[s]ince the Delaware RICO statute is essentially an adaptation of its federal counterpart, reliance on federal precedent in this limited factual setting is warranted.”
  • “Since the Delaware RICO statute is essentially an adaptation of its federal counterpart, reliance on federal precedent in this limited factual setting is warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.