Stroetz v. Burke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “attorneys’ eyes only” disclosure is appropriate “only in limited circumstances,” such as trade secret cases
• “Although Harvard would certainly prefer to keep the identities of the ad hoc committee members secret from Theidon, it has not demonstrated that it is entitled to confidentiality under the law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).