Stroda v. Joice Holdings, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an easement by 33 necessity included a right to utilities because the reasonable use of residential property required utility services
• relying on Restatement [First] of Property § 484, comment b [1944]
• when material facts are undisputed, appellate review of the district court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
• when material facts are undisputed, appellate review of the district court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
• scope of implied easement properly considered on summary judgment because material facts undisputed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).