Skip to main content

Stripling v. State

Citations

  • 664 So. 2d 2
  • 1995 WL 59589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding court's rulings restricting defendant's voir dire not preserved where defendant affirmatively accepted the jury upon selection of the twelfth juror and did not renew his objection prior to jury being sworn
  • trial court rulings that allegedly unduly restricted defendant's voir dire inquiry; held, issue not preserved
  • defendants claimed error of trial court's restriction of voir dire inquiry not preserved where he failed to renew objection prior to the swearing of the jury
  • defendants claimed error of trial court’s restriction of voir dire inquiry not preserved where he failed to renew objection prior to the swearing of the jury
  • defense claims that trial court unduly restricted voir dire inquiry were not preserved for appellate review where defendant affirmatively accepted the jury and did not renew his objection at any time prior to swearing of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jorgenson, Cope and Goderich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.