Stripling v. Schaff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \new rule\ doctrine of Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989
• “[T]he Supreme Court made clear [in Caspari ] that federal courts must analyze whether a habeas petitioner seeks to extend the boundaries of existing law before considering the merits of the claim, if the state so argues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).