Striplin v. Allstate Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to follow Yates and discussing cases addressing ambiguity and anti-stacking clauses
• there is no per se rule that multiple limits of coverage creates ambiguity
• there is no per se rule that multiple limits of coverage create ambiguity
• “Any provision of a lengthy document is bound to be ambiguous in the sense that it creates questions that can be answered only with reference to other portions of the document. That is why all provisions of an insurance policy must be construed together.”
• “Any provision of a lengthy document is bound to be ambiguous in the sense that it creates questions that can be answered only with reference to other portions of the document. That is why all provisions of an insurance policy must be construed together.”
• referring to “the Bruder dicta”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).