Stringfellow v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[bjecause there [was] no showing in the record that claimant repeatedly violated explicit policies after several warnings,” the court found that claimant’s violation of the employer’s policies without warning did not constitute disqualifying misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).