Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The question is whether a given shareholder or small number of shareholders has the requisite power to dictate or dominate corporate decisions.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 42×
• Hayes v. Olmsted & Associates, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-28· cited 17×
• Chrome Data Systems, Inc. v. Stringer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-13· cited 7×
• Locati v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-21· cited 3×
• BYBEE FARMS, LLC v. Snake River Sugar Co.
  E.D. Washington· 2007-11-09· cited 2×
• Yanez v. Graco Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 2014-09-08

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chiles v. Robertson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-01-11· cited 42×
• Bonds v. Landers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-07-12· cited 27×
• Zidell v. Zidell, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-03· cited 26×
• Chiles v. Robertson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-05-24· cited 24×