Skip to main content
· 1/28/1921

Striger v. Carter

Citations

  • 190 Ky. 319
  • 227 S.W. 448
  • 1921 Ky. LEXIS 433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the defendants did not meet their burden of showing the asserted patents were directed to an abstract idea at step one after rejecting defendants’ characterization of the abstract idea because it “ignore[d] significant claim limitations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.