Strickler v. United Elevator Co. (Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where plaintiff used driveway as she pleased without asking for or receiving permission for more than twenty-one years, use was “adverse, open, continuous, notorious and uninterrupted” and plaintiff was entitled to easement by prescription

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mitchell v. United Elevator Co., Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-28· cited 48×
• Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 32×
• Tice v. Nationwide Life Insurance
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-06· cited 30×
• Brennan v. Manchester Crossings, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-02-25· cited 27×
• Tice v. Nationwide Life Insurance
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 24×
• Graham v. Kutler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-15· cited 11×
• Gehres v. Falls Township
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-05-13· cited 8×
• Osttowski v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-17· cited 5×
• Wayne v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Insurance
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 2×
• Matos v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-07· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Fleck v. McHugh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-06-28· cited 28×