District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/1/1995
Strickland v. Thelman
Citations
- 665 So. 2d 284
- 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12458
- 1995 WL 703633
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that whether there was a mutual mistake is a question of fact
- relying on Scutieri and noting that parties “may be ‘charged’ with constructive notice” of public court document, though they lacked actual notice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Antoon, Griffin, Harris, Only
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AshbySupreme Court of Florida· 1971-01-06· cited 186×
- Scutieri v. PaigeEleventh Circuit· 1987-01-26· cited 67×
- Hieber v. HieberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-04-09· cited 16×
- Estevez v. GordonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-22· cited 14×
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-12· cited 11×
- Swilley v. LongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-11-07· cited 10×
- East v. PENSACOLA TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-16· cited 7×
- State v. StephensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-17· cited 5×
- Cardinale v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.