Strickland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellate courts have a \duty to consider what it perceives to be the substance of the enumerations\
• appellate courts have a “duty to consider 6 what it perceives to be the substance of the enumerations”
• even where an appeal is not “as artfully drawn as might be desired,” this Court has a “duty to consider what it perceives to be the substance of the enumerations”
• even where an appeal is not “as artfully drawn as might be desired,” this Court has a “duty to consider what it perceives to be the substance of the enumerations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• North Druid Development, LLC v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-19· cited 12×
• State v. Mohamed
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-02-20· cited 9×
• Tenney v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-03-12· cited 6×
• Williams v. Murrell
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-02-22· cited 1×
• Yolanda Williams v. John M. Murrell
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-02-22
• North Druid Development, LLC v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-07
• State v. James Willie West
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2026-01-09

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• England v. Newton
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1977-03-10· cited 26×
• Entrekin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-10-25· cited 15×
• Higdon v. Cooper
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-06-30· cited 12×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-05-12· cited 9×
• Daniel v. Whitlock
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1966-05-26· cited 5×
• Howell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-10-28· cited 4×