Strickland v. Pinder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding without merit appellant’s argument that the expert’s educational and professional background was sufficient to demonstrate a knowledge for his national standard of care testimony was without merit.
• “Dr. Stark made repeated references to a standard and claimed that it was applicable in this case ... [wjithout any supplemental support, however, this testimony amounted to nothing more than the expert’s opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).