Skip to main content
· 4/11/1986

Strickland v. Marshall

Citations

  • 632 F. Supp. 590
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \a petitioner who is representing himself on appeal because he is no longer entitled to the assistance of counsel should not be held to a stringent definition of 'cause' \
  • finding that a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel “could have been raised on direct appeal because defendant had new counsel for the latter proceedings”
  • finding that a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel “could have been raised on direct appeal, because defendant had new counsel for the latter proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timothy S. Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.