Strickland v. A.P. Propane, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to effectuate the intent of Congress that the one-year cap operate to curtail access to diversity jurisdiction after substantial progress has been made in state court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Loyd
  N.D. Texas· 1990-08-02· cited 18×
• Mize v. Amercraft Corp.
  M.D. Alabama· 1994-11-30· cited 6×
• Molden v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
  M.D. Louisiana· 1990-11-20· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Collett
  Supreme Court· 1949-05-31· cited 508×
• Hallowell v. Commons
  Supreme Court· 1916-01-10· cited 235×
• Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 146×
• Greer v. Skilcraft
  N.D. Alabama· 1989-01-31· cited 54×
• Mary M. Skidmore v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc., a Division of Syntex Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1976-04-12· cited 37×
• Coman v. International Playtex, Inc.
  N.D. California· 1989-05-17· cited 28×
• Thomas B. Campbell and Theresa S. Campbell v. Dominick & Dominick, Inc., Dominick Investor Services Corporation, and Lois Sivalls
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-04-20· cited 16×
• Canadian St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians v. New York
  N.D. New York· 1983-11-04· cited 15×