Strickland v. Alderman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that water drained slower from plaintiffs property for purposes of enforcement of standing water ordinance
• requiring both evidence that a petitioner was treated differently than similarly situated persons; and that difference was “for the purpose of discriminating” against the petitioner
• listing elements of § 1983 claim for selective enforcement of a standing water ordinance
• applying the final-decision requirement to due process and equal protection claims
• \An exception to the final decision requirement exists where it would be futile for the plaintiff to pursue a final decision.\
• “As[-]applied due process and equal protection claims are ripe for adjudication when the local authority has rendered its final decision with respect to the application of the regulation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).