Skip to main content
· 11/4/1997

Strickland Tower Maintenance, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation v. At&t Communications, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 128 F.3d 1422
  • 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2693
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30322
  • 1997 WL 686009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a litigant cannot make out a claim of economic duress by alleging merely that the opposing party took advantage of her weak negotiating position or because of “business necessities”
  • “The district court applied Oklahoma law to this case and neither party challenges that finding on appeal. Therefore, we accept the view of the district court that Oklahoma law applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Porfilio, Anderson, Tacha

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.