· 11/4/1997
Strickland Tower Maintenance, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation v. At&t Communications, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee
Citations
- 128 F.3d 1422
- 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2693
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30322
- 1997 WL 686009
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a litigant cannot make out a claim of economic duress by alleging merely that the opposing party took advantage of her weak negotiating position or because of “business necessities”
- “The district court applied Oklahoma law to this case and neither party challenges that finding on appeal. Therefore, we accept the view of the district court that Oklahoma law applies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Porfilio, Anderson, Tacha
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.