Stricker v. Epstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that shareholders’ agreement is between shareholders and cannot bind corporation
• finding that plaintiffs failed to exercise due diligence where evidence existed that something was wrong but plaintiffs failed to inquire
• refusing to toll the statute of limitations when plaintiffs should have realized that something was wrong when they stopped receiving their monthly cheeks and could have examined the corporation’s books to see how their money was being used
• no tolling when shareholders and purchasers of securities stopped receiving monthly checks but failed to exercise right to inspect books of corporation
• no tolling when shareholders and purchasers of securities stopped receiving monthly checks but failed to exercise right to inspect books of corporation
• claims alleging violations of securities laws governed by a two-year statute of limitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).