Strickengloss v. State Corr. Inst. At Mercer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that on remand, the trial court should consider juror testimony about the allegedly prejudicial contact
• explaining that “[t]hreadbare or speculative allegations” will not do the trick
• ―Mattox and its progeny further establish that undue contact with a juror by a 281 U.S. 276, 288 (1930)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).