· 11/15/1864
Stretch v. Schenck
Citations
- 23 Ind. 77
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- involving the sale of an adulterated drug where court upheld punitive damage award
- involving the sale of an adulterated drug where court upheld punitive damage award
- first case recognizing punitive damages in strict liability and rejecting the argument that they are inconsistent
- first case recognizing punitive damages in strict liability and rejecting the argument that they are inconsistent
- punitive damages were allowed for inexcusable gross negligence “whether ignorantly or by design, whether with or without knowledge of the defendants.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.