Skip to main content
· 11/15/1864

Stretch v. Schenck

Citations

  • 23 Ind. 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • involving the sale of an adulterated drug where court upheld punitive damage award
  • involving the sale of an adulterated drug where court upheld punitive damage award
  • first case recognizing punitive damages in strict liability and rejecting the argument that they are inconsistent
  • first case recognizing punitive damages in strict liability and rejecting the argument that they are inconsistent
  • punitive damages were allowed for inexcusable gross negligence “whether ignorantly or by design, whether with or without knowledge of the defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.